DC Fraud Lawyer

WWYW #30 Segment 2: Financial Reform and the SEC

DC Fraud Lawyer — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:55:59 +0000

The Security and Exchange Commission hasn’t done a good job of listening to whistleblowers over the last several years. Numerous whistleblowers have tried to contact the agency over the last decade, only to be ignored, rebuffed, and marginalized. Now that the public has seen the ramifications of the agency’s ignoring of whsitleblowers – most notably the Bernie Madoff scandal – Congress has acted. The recently passed financial reform bill provides the SEC the ability to distribute financial rewards for whistleblowers whose original disclosures of fraud lead to the recovery of over $1 million. The SEC is writing the rules for this reward system – and they want the whistleblowers to come straight to the agency, bypassing their corrupt bosses. Corporations are crying foul and pushing back, calling the program unfair. With the rules set to be finalized next April, this key provision is up in the air. Guests include: Jason Zuckerman, a whistleblower attorney at the Employment Law Group, a Washington, DC based law firm.

Legal information, lawyer representation, About Us

DC Fraud Lawyer — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:50:59 +0000

About us blog for the Consumer Justice Group a Washington, DC law firm with a national practice providing information, attorney representation for people who are victims of stockbroker fraud, nursing home abuse, birth injury, drug recalls, employment discrimination.

The Alex Jones Show 4/8/11: The New Emperors 2/3

DC Fraud Lawyer — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:45:59 +0000

IRS awards 4.5 Million to Whistleblower LadyBlogr April 8, 2011 See IRS awards $4.5M to whistleblower The IRS awarded 4.5 million to an in house accountant that warned a company about a tax lapse in filing. the company ignored him. This led to him to informing the IRS. They have a whistleblowers reward for large companies trying to cheat the government. This led to a 20 million dollars that the company had to pay the government. The whistleblower program only promises awards for returns of $2 million or more. “This law is not designed to snag the guppies, but to harpoon the whales,” said Patrick Burns, president of Taxpayers Against Fraud, a Washington, DC-based nonprofit whose members include many lawyers for whistleblowers. Lets get more of these cheaters out there. www.infowars.com

Boston: Medicare Fraud Summit Opening Remarks

DC Fraud Lawyer — Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:40:59 +0000

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and US Attorney General Eric Holder host the fourth in a series of Health Care Fraud Prevention Summits in Boston, MA, on December, 16, 2010. More info at: www.stopmedicarefraud.gov We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy: newmedia.hhs.gov US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) www.hhs.gov

New Hampshire Obviously Doesn?t Want Change, Do You?

DC Fraud Lawyer — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:55:59 +0000

The votes have been counted from the New Hampshire primary. McCain has been declared the winner of the Republican primary and Clinton has been declared the winner on the Democrat side. I sit in a state of disbelief. Lately in this campaign season I’ve heard much about change. I’ve heard Barak Obama talk about being the candidate of change. Hillary Clinton has claimed she is the one who could change things. Mike Huckabee has claimed he is the outsider that can march into Washington DC and deliver change. What change would they deliver? Would they end the wars we are involved in and bring our troops home as soon as possible? Would they change monetary policy and bring us a dollar backed by something, anything besides debt, a dollar that would not inflate, a dollar that would not end up worthless if I was to save one? Would they stop the insane printing of money? Would they introduce sound fiscal policy? Would they cut the federal government down to proper size? Would they restore the guarantees protecting our human rights as guaranteed by our constitution? Would they protect our borders? Would they get the government out of our lives and let us live as we want to live, or will they continue to exert more and more control over us until their control is total?

Ron Paul is the only candidate with definitive policies to deliver substantive change to our political system. McCain, Clinton, Giuliani, Edwards, Romney, Huckabee and Obama all promise more war in Iraq, more death for our men, more genocide for the Iraqis, more destruction and irradiation of southwest Asia, and more money (your tax dollars at work) for their comrades in the military industrial complex. This is not change. They refuse to get our ships out of the Persian Gulf and will most likely end up going to war with Iran. This is not change. They will not rescind any of the unconstitutional laws passed by this congress and George W. Bush. They will not protect our borders. They will continue to print money to pay for their wars until it isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on or the ink that colors it. This is not change. These candidates represent the same old, same old. They do not represent the common man. They are criminals trashing the highest law in the land and not caring one iota for anyone other than themselves, their friends and contributors. One wonders if they ever even bothered to read the constitution, let alone if they understand its meaning.

New Hampshire calls itself the “Live Free or Die” state. After these results, I must laugh at that motto. The citizens of New Hampshire obviously need a little lesson in the meaning of freedom. I guess they are no different than any other citizens in these Socialist States of America. Just in terms of the issue of the wars, there are several other candidates besides any of the Democrats or Republicans who ended up on the top in New Hampshire. I’ve seen polls that claim nearly 70% of Americans oppose the war and yet 90% of the voters casting ballots in New Hampshire cast them for candidates who voted for the war and who have no clear cut strategy or timeline to get out of Iraq. Ron Paul isn’t the only anti-war candidate, Kucinich and Gravel also call for the immediate withdraw of our troops from Iraq. The candidates who finished first in New Hampshire have not only waffled on withdraw of our troops from Iraq, but they have also refused to take the option of attacking Iran off the table. Iran poses no security threat to the United States and attacking them would be immoral and illegal under international law. Why is it that in the “Live Free or Die” state, where change is being called for, did the candidates for change do so poorly? Is it the herd mentality at work? Assuming there was no election fraud, and there may have been some but probably not much, then it is difficult to say exactly what happened. One would have thought that in such a state more voters would have done their homework. Either that, or the people have been fooled and believe that they actually did vote for anti-war candidates. Or, the people of New Hampshire are actually in favor of American hegemony and hence in favor of the war. In any case, the results are discouraging.

If Americans choose to continue to vote for the status quo, then so be it. Clinton or McCain, Obama or Huckabee, Edwards or Romney, there is no real difference between any of these people. They all want big government, the bigger the better. They all want to keep extorting money from you. They all want to control your life. They all want power. If the people voting for these big government politicians want to submit to that and remain subservient to the state, that’s fine with me. If they don’t mind sending their children overseas to fight in foreign wars for the profits of the huge corporations influencing our government officials, that’s their business. I hope they don’t mind if I opt out of their little program. Then again, if I decide to opt out, I might end up dead or imprisoned as the force of the state is applied to make me cooperate against my will. Perhaps when people see their neighbors being taken away and imprisoned for deciding how to run their own lives, perhaps then they’ll finally get it. Freedom doesn’t come cheap, and yet the price one pays for service to the state is much more expensive. The state may destroy your life if you seek freedom, but it will destroy your grandchildren’s lives if you choose servitude.

Originally published here.

sumit

ACORN Alive And Trying To Wreck 2010 Election, Matthew Vadum on Fox Business Oct. 26 2010

DC Fraud Lawyer — Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:35:59 +0000

Read Matthew Vadum’s new book “Subversion Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers.” The radical un-American group Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) is very much alive despite reports of its demise. It is restructuring in time to help re-elect President Obama in 2012. Obama used to work for ACORN and represented the group in court as its lawyer. Buy the book at Amazon: tinyurl.com Visit the “Subversion Inc.” Facebook page at www.facebook.com Matthew Vadum of Capital Research Center, Washington, DC, appeared on “Follow the Money,” (Fox Business Network) on Oct. 26, 2010, to discuss his new research on the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. ACORN, the radical left-wing advocacy group, is very much alive on the eve of the US congressional elections. Its voter mobilization arm, Project Vote, which used to employ Barack Obama, is doing its best to muck things up. Project Vote’s voter drive is being run by ACORN executive Amy Busefink, who goes on trial in Las Vegas Nov. 29 for conspiracy to commit felony voter registration fraud. Amazing, isn’t it? With all ACORN’s troubles it has a person under suspicion for massive election fraud running its 2010 election operation. To read Vadum’s articles on this topic, go to www.washingtontimes.com and www.capitalresearch.org and www.humanevents.com

Faulty Foreclosures

DC Fraud Lawyer — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:50:59 +0000

There are a lot of question circulating the freeze on foreclosures and the effects it may have on us as homeowners. So let’s try to sum up what is going on…

The head of a key congressional committee called on top U.S. mortgage lenders and banks to put a voluntarily mortgage freeze (stop) on foreclosures in all 50 states including DC until the banks’ legal departments review their companies’ procedures.

A total of 5 Banks (as of Oct 11, 2010) have agreed to undergo procedural investigations, some in all 50 states. The banks are Bank of America, GMAC, Ally Financial, PNC, JPMorgan. These banks continue to pay for the costs of maintaining seized and foreclosed home inventory until the end of the foreclosure freeze. The foreclosure freeze is estimated to last 90 days, but may have residual effects for years to come.

Hmm…now your probably wondering what procedures are being investigated? Well, how about fraud for one, not to mention other allegations being made by multiple sources. The fraud, in this case, is being referred to as “robo signing” Robo signing occurs when one person signs hundreds of documents by skimming text and without fully reading them. The law requires that person be under oath and swear everything in the foreclosure documents is 100% correct and accurate.

So what if my home has been foreclosed on due to robo-signing or faulty documentation? That’s the million dollar question. How will we ever know? Stay tuned to find out more…

One thing is for sure, take advantage of the foreclosure freeze if you are currently in foreclosure. Know your state foreclosure laws, and follow blogs or news for important updates. Use this time to get out of debt, rebuild your credit and your life.

Originally published here.

Kathy Marshall

2011 HEAT Provider Compliance Training – Compliance Program Basics

DC Fraud Lawyer — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:33:59 +0000

Compliance Program Basics with the Industry Guidance Branch, Senior Counsel OIG/HHS at the May 18th 2011 HEAT Provider Compliance Training in Washington, DC. – - – More info at oig.hhs.gov We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy newmedia.hhs.gov US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) www.hhs.gov

How Does The Fcra Protect My Credit Report?

DC Fraud Lawyer — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:45:59 +0000

The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) promotes the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. There are many types of consumer reporting agencies, including credit bureaus and specialty agencies (such as agencies that sell information about check writing histories, medical records, and rental history records). Here is a summary of your major rights under the FCRA. For more information, including information about additional rights, go to www.ftc.gov/credit or write to: Consumer Response Center, Room 130-A, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave.

N.W., Washington, DC 20580.

You must be told if information in your file has been used against you. Anyone who uses a credit report or another type of consumer report to deny your application for credit, insurance, or employment — or to take another adverse action against you — must tell you, and must give you the name, address and phone number of the agency that provided the information.

You have the right to know what is in your file. You may request and obtain all the information about you in the files of a consumer reporting agency (your “file disclosure”). You will be required to provide proper identification, which may include your Social Security number. In many cases, the disclosure will be free.

You are entitled to a free file disclosure if:

A person has taken adverse action against you because of information in your credit report;

You are the victim of identify theft and place a fraud alert in your file;

Your file contains inaccurate information as a result of fraud;

You are on public assistance;

You are unemployed but expect to apply for employment within 60 days.

In addition, by September 2005 all consumers will be entitled to one free disclosure every 12 months upon request from each nationwide credit bureau and from nationwide specialty consumer reporting agencies. See www.ftc.gov/credit for additional information.

You have the right to ask for a credit score. Credit scores are numerical summaries of your credit worthiness based on information from credit bureaus. You may request a credit score from consumer reporting agencies that create scores or distribute scores used in residential real property loans, but you will have to pay for it. In some mortgage transactions, you will receive credit score information for free from the mortgage lender.

You have the right to dispute incomplete or inaccurate information. If you identify information in your file that is incomplete or inaccurate and report it to the consumer reporting agency, the agency must investigate unless your dispute is frivolous. See www.ftc.gov/credit for an explanation of dispute procedures.

Consumer reporting agencies must correct or delete inaccurate, incomplete or unverifiable information. Inaccurate, incomplete or unverifiable information must be removed or corrected, usually within 30 days. However, a consumer reporting agency may continue to report information it has verified as accurate.

Consumer reporting agencies may not report outdated negative information. In most cases, a consumer reporting agency may not report negative information that is more than seven years old, or bankruptcies that are more than 10 years old.

Access to your file is limited. A consumer reporting agency may provide information about you only to people with a valid need – usually to consider an application with a creditor, insurer, employer, landlord, or other business. The FCRA specifies those with a valid need for access.

You must give your consent for reports to be provided to employers. A consumer reporting agency may not give out information about you to your employer, or a potential employer, without your written consent given to the employer. Written consent generally is not required in the trucking industry. For more information, go to www.ftc.gov/credit.

You may limit “prescreened” offers of credit and insurance you get based on information in your credit report. Unsolicited “prescreened” offers for credit and insurance must include a toll-free phone number you can call if you choose to remove your name and address from the lists these offers are based on. You may opt-out with the nationwide credit bureaus at 1-888-567-8688.

You may seek damages from violators. If a consumer reporting agency, or, in some cases, a user of consumer reports or a furnisher of information to a consumer reporting agency violates the FCRA, you may be able to sue in state or federal court.

Identity theft victims and active duty military personnel have additional rights. For more information, visit www.ftc.gov/credit

States may enforce the FCRA, and many states have their own consumer reporting laws. In some cases, you may have more rights under state law. For more information, contact your state or local consumer protection agency or your state Attorney General.

The Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA), which is a subset of the more comprehensive Truth in Lending Act, which essentially tells original creditors how they should behave. http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcb/fcb.pdf

Have you ever been billed for merchandise you returned or never received? Has your credit card company ever charged you twice for the same item or failed to credit a payment to your account? While frustrating, these errors can be corrected. It takes a little patience and knowledge of the dispute settlement procedures provided by the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA).

The law applies to “open end” credit accounts, such as credit cards, and revolving charge accounts – such as department store accounts. It does not cover installment contracts – loans or extensions of credit you repay on a fixed schedule. Consumers often buy cars, furniture and major appliances on an installment basis, and repay personal loans in installments as well.

About The Author: Drew Canole, is President of Waterfield Credit a credit education, and repair company that has been in business for 5 years. Drew, has just recently published The 57 Day Challenge To A 720 Credit Score. For some more Free information check out http://www.57daychallenge.com

Originally published here.

Vanessa Doguiles

Is My Ex’s A Private Military Contractor Fraudulently Tampering with My Phone?

DC Fraud Lawyer — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:29:59 +0000

I’m on the phone with another targeted individual when, once again, I’m cut off. This is the umpteenth time in several days. My ex, the cyberterrorist, is at it again. I appear amused but I’m not. I’m heated. I’m tired of this. I’m frustrated that hundreds of thousands of us are under constant attack, we’re posting all over social media and the internet, and WE’RE being labeled crazy. So, why is this happening? I’m certain it’s fraud in government contracting…billions of dollars in fraud, in fact. You see, I’ve done EXACTLY what these criminals were most afraid Id’ do at a time when there is increasing media and public interest in this. (When truTV runs a show called “Conspiracy Theory” on this stuff and the show is a HIT, you KNOW that the public is interested.) I’ve concluded that there is just as much, if not more, fraud in domestic private military and/or intelligence contracts as there is with private contractors overseas. I’ve further concluded that, with the resources being extended for this personal vendetta, my ex and his cohorts are one of those private military/intelligence contractors and is fraudulently using the resources made available through his government contract to stalk me to death. Statistics show that women who are murdered by their ex-partners are stalked in the year prior to their murder. Well, my ex has been stalking me for over a decade and the moment I begin to report the activity, I’m labeled “mentally ill”. Yet, the nearly disbarred lawyer …